Are the boundaries conditional? Theses on research practices and standards
How to Cite
Strelnikova A.V. Are the boundaries conditional? Theses on research practices and standards. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation. 2018. Vol. 10. No. 16. P. 23-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2018.16.2 (in Russ.).
Abstract
This reflection is a preface to the material by D. Rogozin and A. Ipatova, and also it is an invitation to further dialogue.
Keywords:
research practice, ethics, interview
References
Korbut A. (2015) Govorite po ocheredi: netekhnicheskoye vvedeniye v konversatsionnyy analiz [Turn-Talking: Non-technical Introduction to Conversation Analysis]. Russian Sociological Review, vol. 14, no 1, pp. 120–141.
Korbut A. (2016) Shablon v strukture deystviya: elektronnyye meditsinskiye karty i rutinizatsiya v meditsinskoy praktike [A Template in the Structure of Action: Electronic Health Records and the Routinization of Clinical Practice], Russian Sociological Review, vol. 15, no 1, pp. 34–53.
Merton R. (2006) Sotsial’naya teoriya i sotsial’naya struktura [Social theory and social structure]. Translated by E. Egorova et al; ed by E. Kaganov. Moscow: AST, pp. 246–272.
Polukhina E., Strelnikova A. Exploring the Russian Online Gift-Exchange Communities: the Results of Nethnographic Approach // The Qualitative Report. 2015. Vol. 20. No. 12. P. 2041–2049.
Turchik A. V. (2010) Konversatsionnyy analiz rechevogo vzaimodeystviya v situatsii issledovatel’skogo interv’yu [Conversion analysis of speech interaction in a situation of a research interview]. Phd thesis. Moscow: RUDN. URL: http://doc.knigix.ru/22istoriya/583792–2‑konversacionniy-analiz-rechevogovzaimodeystviya-situacii-issledovatelskogo-intervyu.php (accessed at: 07.10.2018)
Shteinberg I. (2017) Kak polevyye interv’yuyery «spasayut pole» ili «kommunikatsionnyye miny» v interv’yu [How field interviewers “save the field” or “communication mines” in an interview]. Sociologist at the field. Author’ blog. Post at 14.12.2017 URL: http://fieldsociology.blogspot.com/2017/12/blogpost.
html (accessed at: 07.10.2018)
Korbut A. (2016) Shablon v strukture deystviya: elektronnyye meditsinskiye karty i rutinizatsiya v meditsinskoy praktike [A Template in the Structure of Action: Electronic Health Records and the Routinization of Clinical Practice], Russian Sociological Review, vol. 15, no 1, pp. 34–53.
Merton R. (2006) Sotsial’naya teoriya i sotsial’naya struktura [Social theory and social structure]. Translated by E. Egorova et al; ed by E. Kaganov. Moscow: AST, pp. 246–272.
Polukhina E., Strelnikova A. Exploring the Russian Online Gift-Exchange Communities: the Results of Nethnographic Approach // The Qualitative Report. 2015. Vol. 20. No. 12. P. 2041–2049.
Turchik A. V. (2010) Konversatsionnyy analiz rechevogo vzaimodeystviya v situatsii issledovatel’skogo interv’yu [Conversion analysis of speech interaction in a situation of a research interview]. Phd thesis. Moscow: RUDN. URL: http://doc.knigix.ru/22istoriya/583792–2‑konversacionniy-analiz-rechevogovzaimodeystviya-situacii-issledovatelskogo-intervyu.php (accessed at: 07.10.2018)
Shteinberg I. (2017) Kak polevyye interv’yuyery «spasayut pole» ili «kommunikatsionnyye miny» v interv’yu [How field interviewers “save the field” or “communication mines” in an interview]. Sociologist at the field. Author’ blog. Post at 14.12.2017 URL: http://fieldsociology.blogspot.com/2017/12/blogpost.
html (accessed at: 07.10.2018)
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Strelnikova, A. V. (2018). Are the boundaries conditional? Theses on research practices and standards. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation, 10(16), 23-25. https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2018.16.2
Section
Field work research
