Where Does the Qualitative Methodology Go? Collective Discussion

Research Article
How to Cite
Zdravomyslova E.A., Yarskaya-Smirnova E.R., Omelchenko E.L., Shteynberg I.E. Where Does the Qualitative Methodology Go? Collective Discussion. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation. 2022. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 9-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2022.14.1.1 (in Russ.).

Abstract

The qualitative paradigm is at a new stage of development. That is the position of the well-known international journal FQS (Forum: Qualitative Social Research), which started the discussion “Quality of qualitative research”, where it raises topical issues of further development of the field as a kind of “Where is the qualitative paradigm going?”.Taking up this initiative, our journal invited the experts to speak on the block of questions proposed by colleagues, but with reference to the Russian-speaking segment of the field.Well-known leaders in this area – Elena Zdravomyslova, Elena Yarskaya-Smirnova, Elena Omelchenko, Ilya Steinberg – responded to the journal’s proposal. Here we publish their answers to the questions discussed.
Keywords:
qualitative methodology, quality criteria, research ethics, education system

Author Biographies

Elena Andreevna Zdravomyslova, European University at St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russia
Candidate of Sociology, Professor
Elena Rostislavovna Yarskaya-Smirnova, HSE University, Moscow, Russia
Doctor of Sociology, Head of International Laboratory for Social Integration Research; Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences
Elena Leonidovna Omelchenko, HSE University, St. Petersburg, Russia
Doctor of Sociology, Director, Centre for Youth Studies; Professor, Department of Sociology
Ilya Efimovich Shteynberg, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow, Russia
Candidate of Philosophy, Senior Researcher; Head of School for a Qualitative Researcher, Scientific and Educational Center

References

Aspers P., Corte U. (2019) What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology. No. 42. P. 139—160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7

Batygin G.S., Devyatko I.F. (1994) Mif o “kachestvennoj sociologii” [The Myth of “Qualitative Sociology”]. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. No. 2. P. 28—42. (In Russ.)

Burawoy M. (1997) Razvernutoe monograficheskoe issledovanie: mezhdu pozitivizmom i postmodernizmom [The Extended Case Method: Steering a Course between Positivism and Postmodernism]. Rubezh (al'manah social'nyh issledovanij) [Frontier (Almanac of Social Research)]. No. 10—11. P. 154—176. (In Russ.)

Denzin N.K. (2008) The New Paradigm Dialogs and Qualitative Inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. Vol. 21. No. 4. P. 315—325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390802136995

Hammersly M. (1992) Some Reflections on Ethnography and Validity. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. Vol. 5. No. 3. P. 195—203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839920050301

Katz J. (2015) A Theory of Qualitative Methodology: The Social System of Analytic Fieldwork. Méthod(e)s African Review of Social Sciences Methodology. Vol. 1. No. 1—2. P. 131—146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23754745.2015.1017282

O’Brien B. et al. (2014) Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Academic Medicine. Vol. 89. No. 9. P. 1245—1251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000388

Riessman C.K. (1993) Narrative Analysis. Newbury Park: SAGE.

Stenfors T., Kajamaa A., Bennett D. (2020) How to… Assess the Quality of Qualitative Research. The Clinical Teacher. Vol. 17. No. 6. P. 596—599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13242

Tong A., Sainsbury P., Craig J. (2007) Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32-item Checklist for Interviews and Focus Groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. Vol. 19. No. 6. P. 349—357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

Tracy S. (2010) Qualitative Quality: Eight ‘Big-Tent’ Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry. Vol. 16. No. 10. P. 837—851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1077800410383121

Voronkov V.M. (2003) Etot bezumnyj, bezumnyj, bezumnyj kolichestvennyj mir [This Crazy, Crazy, Crazy Quantitative World]. Neprikosnovennyj zapas [Inviolable Reserve]. No. 3. URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2004/3/etot-bezumnyj-bezumnyj-bezumnyj-kolichestvennyj-mir.html (accessed 25/02/2022). (In Russ.)

Yin R. (1983) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills: SAGE.
Article

Received: 15.01.2022

Accepted: 27.03.2022

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Zdravomyslova, E. A., Yarskaya-Smirnova, E. R., Omelchenko, E. L., & Shteynberg, I. E. (2022). Where Does the Qualitative Methodology Go? Collective Discussion. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation, 14(1), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2022.14.1.1
Section
Theoretical discourses and debates